A plot in Devanahalli was 'sold' three times using a General Power of Attorney. Each buyer paid full consideration. Each buyer received a GPA, an agreement to sell, and a promise that a registered sale deed would follow. None of them received a registered sale deed. When the matter came to a head, the first buyer and the original owner were both making claims on the same land. The second and third buyers had no title at all.
This pattern is not unusual on Bangalore's outskirts. It is the defining risk of GPA-based property transactions — and it is the reason the Supreme Court intervened.
What a GPA is, and what it is not
A General Power of Attorney is an authority instrument. It authorises one person (the agent) to act in specified matters on behalf of another (the principal). In property transactions, a GPA may authorise the agent to manage, mortgage, or sell a property. The agent acts in the principal's name — not in their own right.
A GPA does not transfer ownership. It cannot. Only a registered sale deed, properly stamped and executed before the jurisdictional Sub-Registrar, transfers title to immovable property in Karnataka. This distinction is foundational — and it is the one that the GPA-sale practice deliberately obscures.
The Supreme Court in Suraj Lamp: the legal position settled in 2011
In Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana (2011), the Supreme Court comprehensively addressed the 'SA/GPA/Will' transaction format — where a buyer pays consideration, receives an agreement to sell and a GPA (authorising the buyer to deal with the property as their own), and also receives a will bequeathing the property to the buyer. This bundle of documents was widely used, particularly in Delhi and the NCR, as a substitute for a registered sale deed.
The court held that none of these instruments — alone or in combination — transfers title to immovable property. Only a registered sale deed does. An SA/GPA/Will transaction is enforceable only as an agreement to sell: the buyer has a contractual claim against the seller, not ownership. The buyer cannot grant title to a third party, cannot object to registration by the seller of a subsequent sale deed to someone else on the basis of having 'bought' the property through a GPA, and has no right to remain in possession against a purchaser for value without notice.
The judgment applies equally to Karnataka. Courts here have applied Suraj Lamp in numerous property disputes since 2011. The position is not ambiguous: a GPA sale is not a sale.
The scam pattern — how it actually works
Get an independent legal opinion before you commit any money.
A clean-looking document can still hide a broken title chain, an undisclosed encumbrance or a defective approval. Send the documents you have over WhatsApp and we will tell you what is missing and what is concerning before you proceed.
How our property document verification worksGPA-based transactions create an ideal environment for double and triple sale. Consider the mechanism: the seller executes a GPA in favour of a buyer and collects full consideration. Since no registered sale deed is executed, the Sub-Registrar's EC does not reflect the transaction. The property remains in the seller's name in all official records. The seller then approaches a second buyer, shows a clean EC, and repeats the transaction.
We see three recurring variants. The first is straight double-sale: the same property sold to two different buyers through separate GPA bundles. Neither appears on the EC. Neither can prove registered title. The disputes run for years. The second variant involves the principal revoking the GPA after collecting consideration — since a GPA is revocable unless expressly made irrevocable (and even irrevocable GPAs have limits), the agent's authority vanishes and any subsequent documents signed by the agent are void. The third, and most serious, is where the principal dies before a registered sale deed is executed. A GPA terminates automatically on the principal's death. Every document signed after that point is a nullity.
GPA registration in Karnataka: what it means and what it does not
Registration of a GPA at the Sub-Registrar's office in Karnataka does not validate a GPA-based sale. It means the instrument has been stamped and filed — not that the transaction it authorises is effective or that title has passed. A registered GPA is evidence of the principal's intent; it is not a sale deed.
On stamp duty and registration charges for a GPA: the Karnataka Stamp Act specifies the duty applicable to a power of attorney instrument. The charges depend on whether consideration is paid and on what the GPA authorises. Rates change periodically — the Sub-Registrar's office publishes current guidance values and stamp duty schedules on the Kaveri portal. We do not quote current rates here because they change and an outdated figure in a blog post is worse than no figure. Confirm the current applicable charges directly with the Sub-Registrar's office for the zone where the property is located.
The only safe structure: a registered sale deed
The protection against all of the above is direct and absolute: insist on a registered sale deed, executed in the principal's presence (or through a properly documented and verified GPA for execution only), registered at the jurisdictional Sub-Registrar's office, and confirmed against the EC within days of registration. Nothing short of a registered sale deed transfers title. A buyer who has paid full consideration but holds only a GPA bundle is, in the eyes of Karnataka law, still a buyer under an agreement — not an owner.
Where a GPA is unavoidable for execution — because the owner is an NRI abroad, a senior citizen unable to travel, or an entity acting through its director — the GPA must be strictly limited to execution of the registered sale deed on behalf of the named principal. The buyer's obligation is to verify the GPA is genuine, registered, subsisting, issued by a living principal, and within scope. That verification is a specific exercise. We have set out the checklist in our earlier post on GPA property sales in Bangalore.
How title verification catches the risk
An EC pulled independently from the Kaveri portal will show whether a registered sale deed exists in favour of any prior buyer. If it does not — if the current 'seller' has a GPA bundle from a prior transaction but no registered title — the EC will reflect the original owner, not the person now selling to you. A title search that traces the chain through EC entries rather than accepting the seller's documents at face value will surface this discrepancy immediately.
The EC does not show unregistered prior agreements to sell. It does not show GPAs that were never registered. A complete title verification also includes a public notice in local newspapers and inquiries at the property itself — both designed to surface prior claims that never reached the Sub-Registrar. An EC search alone is necessary; it is not sufficient. The combination of an EC search, a physical original-documents inspection, a public notice, and a litigation search is the standard that an independent title opinion should meet.
Our property document verification service covers the full title chain, EC search, litigation check, and public notice for Bangalore and Karnataka properties, including GPA-chain matters where the title history is complex. Send the documents over WhatsApp at +91 63637 45780 for an initial assessment.
Get an independent legal opinion before you commit any money.
A clean-looking document can still hide a broken title chain, an undisclosed encumbrance or a defective approval. Send the documents you have over WhatsApp and we will tell you what is missing and what is concerning before you proceed.
